Skip to main content
BAMHengeBamwerks

Agent Guide

40 agents, 8 swarms, one quality standard

Forty specialized AI agents organized into eight swarms — each with a clear domain, a defined role, and a shared quality standard. See the full current roster on the Agents page.


Overview

The Bamwerks agent swarm is an AI organization designed to operate like a high-performance company. Each agent has a distinct specialty, a defined role (supervisor or worker), and a chain of accountability. They don't generalize — they specialize.

The swarm runs on FORGE: every non-trivial task follows a structured four-stage cycle (Reason → Act → Reflect → Verify). No single agent ships work without review. Quality gates run in parallel before anything reaches the Founder.

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                      FOUNDER (Sirbam)                            │
│                           │                                      │
│     ┌─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┐               │
│     │                     │                     │               │
│  Operations          Engineering             Intelligence        │
│   (Atlas)             (Stark)                (Oracle)           │
│     │                     │                     │               │
│  ┌──┴──┐             ┌────┴────┐            ┌───┴───┐           │
│ Forge Heimdall    Ada Ratchet  …          Mercury Scribe …      │
│                                                                  │
│     ┌─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┐               │
│     │                     │                     │               │
│  Finance              Security               Quality             │
│  (Midas)             (Sentinel)              (Judge)            │
│     │                     │                     │               │
│  ┌──┴──┐            ┌─────┴────┐           ┌────┴────┐          │
│ Penny Prophet     Cipher Reaper …        Hawk Testify …         │
│                                                                  │
│     ┌────────────────────┬──────────────────────┐               │
│     │                    │                      │               │
│  Business             Life                      │               │
│   (Sir)              (Alfred)                   │               │
│     │                    │                      │               │
│ Chancellor          Chronos Sage …              │               │
│  Herald Nexus                                   │               │
│                                                 │               │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┴───────────────┘

Roles: Supervisors and Workers

Every agent is one of two types:

Supervisors own a domain. They coordinate work, prioritize requests, maintain quality standards, and are accountable for their swarm's output. They report directly to the Founder.

Workers are specialists. They receive task briefs, execute with depth in their area of expertise, and submit their work through the FORGE cycle before it's considered complete.

RoleAccountabilityReports To
SupervisorDomain ownership, swarm outputFounder
WorkerTask-level execution and qualitySwarm supervisor

No worker ships directly to the Founder without supervisor review. No supervisor reviews their own work without an independent quality gate.


How Agents Are Dispatched

When the Founder submits a request, Sir (COO) orchestrates the response:

  1. Triage — Sir identifies which swarm(s) own the relevant domain
  2. Brief creation — A structured task brief is written (goal, constraints, context, output checklist)
  3. Specialist dispatch — The right worker agent receives the brief with role-specific context
  4. Parallel execution — Independent tasks are assigned simultaneously to compress time
  5. Review gates — Quality (Hawk) and Security (Sentinel/Cipher/Vault) review in parallel
  6. Delivery — After both gates pass, Sir delivers the verified output to the Founder

No agent gets more context than its task requires. Engineering agents get the codebase and build tools. Security agents get threat models. This separation keeps the system lean and focused.


FORGE at the Agent Level

Each agent runs FORGE on their own work before submitting it — this is an individual discipline, not just a system-level process.

An agent executing a task does:

StageWhat the agent does
ReasonReads the brief in full. Gathers all referenced context. Identifies any gaps before touching anything.
ActExecutes against the brief with full depth and specialty. Writes, builds, analyzes, or investigates.
ReflectReviews own output critically. Does it meet the brief's success criteria? What could be wrong?
VerifyConfirms deliverables (runs the build, tests the endpoint, checks the spec). Not just "it looks right" — it runs.

The agent submits verified work to their supervisor. The supervisor and review agents then apply FORGE from their own perspectives — catching what the executing agent's assumptions would naturally miss. A security agent reviewing a frontend engineer's output finds things the engineer's own review would never flag.

This layering — agent-level FORGE + reviewer-level FORGE — is what makes autonomous AI work observable and trustworthy.


The Eight Swarms

Each swarm owns a domain and is led by a supervisor. For the current roster — every agent, their role, and their bio — see the Agents page; it's generated straight from the swarm registry, so it's always up to date.

SwarmDomain
🔵 OperationsInfrastructure, tooling, and agent platform
🟡 EngineeringSoftware design and development
🟣 IntelligenceResearch, communications, and knowledge management
🟤 BusinessStrategy, marketing, legal, and partnerships
🟢 FinanceFinancial strategy, cost management, and investment
🩺 QualityQA, testing, and process integrity
🔴 SecurityProtection, access control, and threat intelligence
🩷 LifePersonal operations, wellness, and work-life balance

Design Principles

Specialize, don't generalize. An agent that's good at everything is exceptional at nothing. Ratchet builds fast. Bishop writes clean. Wrench debugs relentlessly. This isn't redundancy — it's depth.

Multiple perspectives, by design. The same assumptions that shape implementation shape self-review. Sending Hawk and Sentinel to review code independently — without seeing each other's findings — produces the disagreement that catches what agreement would miss.

Anti-sycophancy. If reviewers unanimously approve, a contrarian review is triggered. Unanimous praise is a signal, not a conclusion. The swarm actively seeks the problem that optimism would hide.

Evidence over assertions. "I checked it and it's fine" is an assertion. A green build log, a Testify runtime report, and a Sentinel security sign-off are evidence. Bamwerks ships evidence.


Learn how these agents coordinate on every task in the FORGE Process, or see how the overall system is structured in Architecture.